NinjaMic
05-12-2003, 06:31 AM
MCD told me to put this here, and I think this has gone far enough. The battle league was already messed up because Iron used a bitten verse. This is a long read, Dez, but hear me out, 'cause IMO biting on a battle-site is as detrimental as cheating in any sport you can name... shit's like steroids and sabotage. Biters tarnish a rapsite's rep...
Incident 1 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3283
Incident 2 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3263
Incident 3 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3530
Incident 4 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3237
Incident 5 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=36653
Incident 6 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3553
"Incident 1"
Originally posted by IrON-BaRz
I'm about to LeAvE this "rookie"-BATTERED, I'm BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE,
The only time you SeE "gReEn" is on the "HEAD-OF-A-CABAGE!!!"/
This FAGGOT got 'RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM,'* AND IrON_barz-THE-MAN,
Whose KnOWn to ThROw 'flames' like I SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN!!!/
I give 'HEAT'-2-ROOKIES ~ when I GRIPPED-IT~YOU-RAN,
I don't even "BEEF"-WIT-PUSSIES, so STICK-WIT-YA-'SPAM!!!'/
GOT THIS-ON-LOCK, IrOn_barz 'SOO-HOTT' ~ the DEVIL'S-PANICKIN, (get it?!)
You get ya "WIG-ROCKED," like 'throwin PEBBLES-AT-MANNEQUINS!!!'/ LOL
This "fuckin nobody's" COMMITED-2-'NO-SEX' ~ "UR" juSt A 'big-ass' like "JENNIFER-LOPEZ!!!"/ LMAO
I POST-THREADS, makin ya 'PROfile APPROACH-RED,'
Just check my "r.I.p. LiSt" BiTcH~MOST of my 'FOES-DEAD!!!'/
You not only BLOW-HEAD for VOTES, you DEEP-THROAT,
But MOSTLY POST 'average QUOTES' like "C-NOTES!!!"/ (get it?!)
This CAT-SUCKS... for real, how you FIGURE-"UR-MAJOR?!"
Did you ADD-UP the 26 NIGGAZ-THAT-PLAYED-YA?!/** LMAO
LAME-QUEER, STAY-CLEAR of my VIGOROUS-FLAVA ~ if nOt, I'll send ShOtS, pull the TRIGGA-AND-BLAZE-YA!!!/
"This FAGGOT got 'RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM,'* AND IrON_barz-THE-MAN,
Whose KnOWn to ThROw 'flames' like I SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN!!!/ "
Paying close attention to this line reveals that "IrON_barz-THE-MAN" is not in accord with the central syllable pattern established by "RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM" and "SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN". It is the only incidence in the verse in which the rhyme scheme isn't matched and followed to a T. Not only that, but "IrON_barz", witch the exception of it's only other appearance ("GOT THIS-ON-LOCK, IrOn_barz 'SOO-HOTT' ~ the DEVIL'S-PANICKIN,"), is the only point in which an underscore _ appears instead of a hyphen -. Very out of place. Both appeances of "IrON_barz" are completely out of step with the rest of the verse.
Conclusion? A two-syllable word was substituted with "IrON_barz" as a means to include his name in the verse. You'll note that Incidents 2 and 3 show similar situations.
Take an even closer look and you will note the asterik * appearing after "This FAGGOT got RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM*". The statement refers to a past event, so obviously the asterik, as per standard literary practice* is to denote an appendix or sidenote explaining this incident in further detail. However, if you scroll down below the verse to find the addendum or appendix referred to by the asterik, it is nowhere to be found.
(* It's a standard literary practice to place asteriks at key points that allude to further information if the reader wishes to indugle, via an appendix and/or a summarized explanation appearing at the bottom of the page in which it appears. If more than one referral is needed on a single page, the asterik shall succesively increase in number for each addendum. Due to the nature of literary venue, textceeing has widelt adopted this technique to explain the abundance of context-sensitive statements in battle lyrics that would require intimate knowledge to fully understand and appreciate, without disrupting the flow of the peice with mid-flow explainations.)
Reading through the verse further, you'll also come across this -
"Did you ADD-UP the 26 NIGGAZ-THAT-PLAYED-YA?!/**"
This line features another use of asteriks, only this time two of them appear side by side, which now makes the first asterik fully in accord with the common literary implementation. The statement also refers to a past event yet, just as before, no appendix is to be found.
This specific and intentional placement of asteriks (most notably the way they appear solely next to the only two references to unexplained past-tense events) in Iron Barz' verse, as well as the succesive increase from one asterik to a conjoinment of two, dispells any and all claims that they are merely superflous elements of the verse intended to add to the verse's over-all appearance.
This denoting of punchline explanation is literary proof that there's a missing addendum or appendix from his verse that would have appeared in the original copy. In conjunction with his own name-drop being the sole disruption of rhyme-scheme, this is irrefutable proof that the verse was originally written for a different opponent, and that the names in the verse were merely switched out for he and his opponent's names to make the verse appear genuine.
In any normal case it could possibly be mere recycling, but if it was simply recycled material by the original author, he would have had the natural understanding of his own work to remove not just the appendix, but the asteriks alluding to it as well. In conjunction with this, the other Incidents show him proving time and time again that he doesn't have the understanding of these verses that the actual author would. Be it by inserting names in the wrong places to the point where he's dissing himself by mistake (see: Incident 3), or in ways that disrupt the otherwise well-constructed rhyme schemes and/or wordplay (see: Incidents 1, 2, 4, and 5).
In Incident 5, he was just plain stupid enough to leave in the original writer's name in some places! ("Terror")
Finally... in "Incident 6", I gave him at least a chance to prove himself, and he fails to show that he can provide material of a self-styled, tailor-made nature.
Therefore this is a case of biting. There's just too many slip-ups, and the evidence is too strong. Not even the possibility of recycling is admissable for a counter-arguement. Iron Barz is a biter. Hardcore, repeat biter that's fucking up the site. Case closed.
Incident 1 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3283
Incident 2 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3263
Incident 3 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3530
Incident 4 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3237
Incident 5 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=36653
Incident 6 - http://www.rapworlds.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3553
"Incident 1"
Originally posted by IrON-BaRz
I'm about to LeAvE this "rookie"-BATTERED, I'm BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE,
The only time you SeE "gReEn" is on the "HEAD-OF-A-CABAGE!!!"/
This FAGGOT got 'RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM,'* AND IrON_barz-THE-MAN,
Whose KnOWn to ThROw 'flames' like I SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN!!!/
I give 'HEAT'-2-ROOKIES ~ when I GRIPPED-IT~YOU-RAN,
I don't even "BEEF"-WIT-PUSSIES, so STICK-WIT-YA-'SPAM!!!'/
GOT THIS-ON-LOCK, IrOn_barz 'SOO-HOTT' ~ the DEVIL'S-PANICKIN, (get it?!)
You get ya "WIG-ROCKED," like 'throwin PEBBLES-AT-MANNEQUINS!!!'/ LOL
This "fuckin nobody's" COMMITED-2-'NO-SEX' ~ "UR" juSt A 'big-ass' like "JENNIFER-LOPEZ!!!"/ LMAO
I POST-THREADS, makin ya 'PROfile APPROACH-RED,'
Just check my "r.I.p. LiSt" BiTcH~MOST of my 'FOES-DEAD!!!'/
You not only BLOW-HEAD for VOTES, you DEEP-THROAT,
But MOSTLY POST 'average QUOTES' like "C-NOTES!!!"/ (get it?!)
This CAT-SUCKS... for real, how you FIGURE-"UR-MAJOR?!"
Did you ADD-UP the 26 NIGGAZ-THAT-PLAYED-YA?!/** LMAO
LAME-QUEER, STAY-CLEAR of my VIGOROUS-FLAVA ~ if nOt, I'll send ShOtS, pull the TRIGGA-AND-BLAZE-YA!!!/
"This FAGGOT got 'RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM,'* AND IrON_barz-THE-MAN,
Whose KnOWn to ThROw 'flames' like I SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN!!!/ "
Paying close attention to this line reveals that "IrON_barz-THE-MAN" is not in accord with the central syllable pattern established by "RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM" and "SPIT-WIT-THE-KLAN". It is the only incidence in the verse in which the rhyme scheme isn't matched and followed to a T. Not only that, but "IrON_barz", witch the exception of it's only other appearance ("GOT THIS-ON-LOCK, IrOn_barz 'SOO-HOTT' ~ the DEVIL'S-PANICKIN,"), is the only point in which an underscore _ appears instead of a hyphen -. Very out of place. Both appeances of "IrON_barz" are completely out of step with the rest of the verse.
Conclusion? A two-syllable word was substituted with "IrON_barz" as a means to include his name in the verse. You'll note that Incidents 2 and 3 show similar situations.
Take an even closer look and you will note the asterik * appearing after "This FAGGOT got RIPPED-BY-THE-FAM*". The statement refers to a past event, so obviously the asterik, as per standard literary practice* is to denote an appendix or sidenote explaining this incident in further detail. However, if you scroll down below the verse to find the addendum or appendix referred to by the asterik, it is nowhere to be found.
(* It's a standard literary practice to place asteriks at key points that allude to further information if the reader wishes to indugle, via an appendix and/or a summarized explanation appearing at the bottom of the page in which it appears. If more than one referral is needed on a single page, the asterik shall succesively increase in number for each addendum. Due to the nature of literary venue, textceeing has widelt adopted this technique to explain the abundance of context-sensitive statements in battle lyrics that would require intimate knowledge to fully understand and appreciate, without disrupting the flow of the peice with mid-flow explainations.)
Reading through the verse further, you'll also come across this -
"Did you ADD-UP the 26 NIGGAZ-THAT-PLAYED-YA?!/**"
This line features another use of asteriks, only this time two of them appear side by side, which now makes the first asterik fully in accord with the common literary implementation. The statement also refers to a past event yet, just as before, no appendix is to be found.
This specific and intentional placement of asteriks (most notably the way they appear solely next to the only two references to unexplained past-tense events) in Iron Barz' verse, as well as the succesive increase from one asterik to a conjoinment of two, dispells any and all claims that they are merely superflous elements of the verse intended to add to the verse's over-all appearance.
This denoting of punchline explanation is literary proof that there's a missing addendum or appendix from his verse that would have appeared in the original copy. In conjunction with his own name-drop being the sole disruption of rhyme-scheme, this is irrefutable proof that the verse was originally written for a different opponent, and that the names in the verse were merely switched out for he and his opponent's names to make the verse appear genuine.
In any normal case it could possibly be mere recycling, but if it was simply recycled material by the original author, he would have had the natural understanding of his own work to remove not just the appendix, but the asteriks alluding to it as well. In conjunction with this, the other Incidents show him proving time and time again that he doesn't have the understanding of these verses that the actual author would. Be it by inserting names in the wrong places to the point where he's dissing himself by mistake (see: Incident 3), or in ways that disrupt the otherwise well-constructed rhyme schemes and/or wordplay (see: Incidents 1, 2, 4, and 5).
In Incident 5, he was just plain stupid enough to leave in the original writer's name in some places! ("Terror")
Finally... in "Incident 6", I gave him at least a chance to prove himself, and he fails to show that he can provide material of a self-styled, tailor-made nature.
Therefore this is a case of biting. There's just too many slip-ups, and the evidence is too strong. Not even the possibility of recycling is admissable for a counter-arguement. Iron Barz is a biter. Hardcore, repeat biter that's fucking up the site. Case closed.