View Full Version : Eagles better Pay TO


crimcartel
08-11-2005, 01:24 PM
cause if they don't , they not going to another NFC championship. Their wide receiver corp is destroyed right now

Blazе
08-11-2005, 10:30 PM
TO is a stupid nigger. He needs to just play the game... He's the last guy I'd want on my team...

Ender
08-11-2005, 10:41 PM
They probale still go to the game but would loose to the panters

crimcartel
08-12-2005, 11:16 AM
eagles will prolley suck this year, they have NO receivers without TO, and even with him it's not enough to beat, the panthers, Green Bay, the Vikings and Atlanta. Sorry, football fans ya'll gotta watch another pats super bowl, hahah

Ender
08-14-2005, 05:24 AM
doubt it pats lost alot of key people this year, and the afc is real strong. So i dont know about that

Blazе
08-14-2005, 11:50 PM
Colts and Ravens are going to be the teams to watch this season. One of them will win the championship.

crimcartel
08-15-2005, 10:55 AM
no pats will win 4 out of 5 to be the only team that ever did that then.....the other teams will have a chance.

The Spectrum
08-16-2005, 08:23 PM
Eagles better suspend TO without pay for the next 5 years, then blackball him out the league.


sorry, but Terrel is just a stupid nigga



and yeah Philly is gonna be this year's version of last years Miami




dont sleep on Bills

Ender
08-17-2005, 12:02 AM
Yeah bills got a squad. They defence go reck, but i dont know about they qb yet. He basically a rookie

The Spectrum
08-17-2005, 01:02 AM
He basically a rookie


so was Tom Brady.


and defence CAN win a championship
remember Baltimore couple years back ?

and that was before they had Jamal Lewis right ?

their QB, forget his name was wack, he got cut the next season
and they had no running game, that year it was ALL defence
Ray Lewis at his finest, every game was like 10-3 or 13-7

*Toby*
08-17-2005, 03:57 AM
Eagles- This is there last Year of NFC Champions. I'd bet my life Dallas takes it next year after all the improvements this off-season.

Patriots- Not only lost 2 starting linebackers, one was a HUGE part bruschi, But they lost BOTH there offense AND Defensive Coordinators. Good luck on that one.

Green Bay- I don;t knwo why they were even mentioned with the word Playoffs. Vikings will EASILY win this division. Green Bay lost there best 2 linemen. Brett should just retire, he hurts them now more then he helps in the playoffs. Proof? Watch the min vs. GB playoff game last year.

My predictions:

Nfc North- Min. Vikings
Nfc West- Arizona Cardinals
Nfc South- Atlanta
Nfc East- Philly
Wild- Carolina, Dallas

Ender
08-17-2005, 08:28 PM
This nigga speaking the truth.

crimcartel
08-18-2005, 12:16 PM
Eagles- This is there last Year of NFC Champions. I'd bet my life Dallas takes it next year after all the improvements this off-season.

Patriots- Not only lost 2 starting linebackers, one was a HUGE part bruschi, But they lost BOTH there offense AND Defensive Coordinators. Good luck on that one.

Green Bay- I don;t knwo why they were even mentioned with the word Playoffs. Vikings will EASILY win this division. Green Bay lost there best 2 linemen. Brett should just retire, he hurts them now more then he helps in the playoffs. Proof? Watch the min vs. GB playoff game last year.

My predictions:

Nfc North- Min. Vikings
Nfc West- Arizona Cardinals
Nfc South- Atlanta
Nfc East- Philly
Wild- Carolina, Dallas



i agree with atlanta and possibly carolina after that.................no
vikings have a shot but there just a popular pick, they'll fade out just in time for the playoffs. cardinals will be imporved but won't win their division. Dallas will be stronger and will give the eagles a run. Philly won't be making it back to the NFC championship. Their time has come and gone. Pats will take 4 out of 5 then fall off. they will be the greatest team once they do that

*Toby*
08-18-2005, 10:05 PM
Do you HONESTLY think they will be the greatest team of all time?

Do you honestly think they could even be put on the same field as the 85' Bears, 92 and 93' Cowboys, the 49ers of the 80's, or steelers of the 70's? I don't

Ender
08-19-2005, 12:13 AM
Naw they wont be the greatest team. But if you ask that nigga last year redsox were the greatest Baseball team.

crimcartel
08-19-2005, 11:05 AM
Do you HONESTLY think they will be the greatest team of all time?

Do you honestly think they could even be put on the same field as the 85' Bears, 92 and 93' Cowboys, the 49ers of the 80's, or steelers of the 70's? I don't
Read the WORDS! The Greatest """"TEAM""" , not the greatest "group of talent". There's a difference. they could play with ANY of those teams because, they have the Team chemistry. I would bet that ALL of those teams have More talent and had great team chemistry, but not Over all Better "TEAMS", if the pats win 4 out of 5. Remember that's never been done, never. and this is the free agency era, which makes it even harder to do. Back then teams would stick withthe same players for years. Now players change teams every year or so.

*Toby*
08-20-2005, 05:48 AM
I'll agree with u, that has never been done. And probably won't be done any time soon. Yes the Pats have great team chemistry and the BEST head coach in the league(even more so then my beloved Bill Parcells) but, they lost alot and Dillon is getting up there in age. Just like every NFL team they have their share of issues. I'm not saying at all they won't be a serious contender but it's very hard to lose 2 starting linebackers, a pro bowl caliber cb, a decent wr, and BOTH coordinators and not even look back. If I had to pick a qb for a big game i'd pick Brady, b/c he makes very smart decisions with the ball. Other then Miami last year, which was a fuckin pathetic loss, he's been a great qb as far as winning and not making the costly mistake. Numbers, yes Manning dominates and Culpepper to, but both struggle in big games by making costly mistakes.

Scrambling qb's also is another thing of mine, untill one of them wins a superbowl i'll take a pocket passer anyday. What makes pocket passer's better in big games is they set up in their pocket and find a target when time allows it. What makes scramblers choke is they are normally TO QUICK to bounce out of the pocket and try to make something happen, instead of allowing opportunities to present themself.

crimcartel
08-20-2005, 10:59 AM
I'll agree with u, that has never been done. And probably won't be done any time soon. Yes the Pats have great team chemistry and the BEST head coach in the league(even more so then my beloved Bill Parcells) but, they lost alot and Dillon is getting up there in age. Just like every NFL team they have their share of issues. I'm not saying at all they won't be a serious contender but it's very hard to lose 2 starting linebackers, a pro bowl caliber cb, a decent wr, and BOTH coordinators and not even look back. If I had to pick a qb for a big game i'd pick Brady, b/c he makes very smart decisions with the ball. Other then Miami last year, which was a fuckin pathetic loss, he's been a great qb as far as winning and not making the costly mistake. Numbers, yes Manning dominates and Culpepper to, but both struggle in big games by making costly mistakes.

Scrambling qb's also is another thing of mine, untill one of them wins a superbowl i'll take a pocket passer anyday. What makes pocket passer's better in big games is they set up in their pocket and find a target when time allows it. What makes scramblers choke is they are normally TO QUICK to bounce out of the pocket and try to make something happen, instead of allowing opportunities to present themself.
i guess we will be watching all season to see what happens. i been telling these fools that the cowboys are gonna challenge for the division title, but everbody dickriding the eagles. I think your "beloved Bill parcells" will do a good job with a solid running game and defense this year (we have to see about the passing game).

Ender
08-20-2005, 02:44 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^What the fuck i agree wit this nigga